Ipso Facto Comic

Zero Income Tax and Zero Payroll Tax

Opera: simply the best internet experience

Download Opera

Just Google It

victory

porkbustersNo More Jean Fraud sKerry Bullshit

Open Trackback Alliance

Get the code for this blogroll


Add to My Yahoo!


Free John Kerry's SF-180 Blogroll

twalogo

The Community for Life, Liberty, Property

Guard the Borders

My Photo
Name:
Location: America's Third World County™, http://thirdworldcounty.us, United States

http://www.thirdworldcounty.us/?page_id=1723

Email Me

If you're using Internet Exploder to view this blog, tough. Get a real browser. :-)

Ignore the Blogspot "profile"—here's the real scoop

What's this blog about, anyway?

Comment-Trackback Policy

Stop the ACLU Blogburst Blogroll

Powered by Blogger

Anti-PC League

Friday, May 06, 2005

Global Warming? Blame it on cleaner air.

If (and it's not yet been scientifically demonstrated) Global Warming freaks are right and we are heading for the furnace, they can thank the clean air freaks
 
Yep.  As anyone with more than two active brain cells knows, the "global warming" hypothesis is as yet not really tested. (The link is to comments of but one of many, many folks who just want some genuine research on the topic. See a few more here. Just a few of thousands such. See here and here and here for a couple of smart folks' comments, even if one is a congresscritter. :-) The "studies" that support the hypothesis so far are about 90% propoganda with about 10% scientific gobbledegook thrown in (including in both percentages the numbers of complete fakes).
 
But this seems to indicate that if global warming is a genuine issue, then it may well be due to cleaner air allowing more sunlight to reach the ground.
 
"...a downward trend in the amount of sunlight reaching the surface, which has been observed since measurements began in the late 1950s, is now over.
 
"The researchers argue that this trend, commonly called 'global dimming', reversed more than a decade ago, probably following the collapse of communist economies and the consequent decrease in industrial pollutants."
 
And that, the article asserts, could be a problem.
 
Talk about the law of unintended consequences...
|